Temporal and spatial trends in suicide-related visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, 2018-2021.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 disproportionately impacted mental health in disadvantaged populations and areas. However, disparities in long-term changes in suicide-related visits across the US are unclear. This retrospective study aims to characterize temporal and spatial changes in suicide-related visits in healthcare settings from 2018 to 2021 in the U.S. METHODS: We use electronic health records for 21,860,370 patients from Healthjump through the COVID-19 Research Database Consortium. Healthjump harmonizes EHR data from over 55 national databases across the US. Suicide ideation and suicide attempts between January 1, 2018 and December 12, 2021 were identified by the diagnosis codes in 6 periods in 2021 compared with the same periods in 2018-2020. RESULTS: There was 30,019 suicidal ideation, and 7392 suicide attempt visits from January 2018 to November 2021. 15-20-year-olds were the most represented age group at 6302 suicide ideation visits (21.0 % of suicide ideation visits) and 1326 suicide attempt visits (17.9 % of suicide attempt visits), followed by suicide-related visits among 60+ years old. Compared with pre-pandemic periods, youth aged 15-20, females, White, non-Hispanic, and English speakers had increased suicide-related visits, especially suicidal ideation (P < 0.05). Suicide attempts with non-medical substances increased to 28.0 % in the first 6 months of the pandemic in 2020, compared with the prior year (21.5 %). COVID-19 patients had increased suicidal ideation in 2020. LIMITATIONS: The EHR data is not nationally representative. CONCLUSIONS: This study found significant and disproportionate increases in suicide related visits over the COVID-19 stages. To prevent the next storms of suicides, future interventions shall accommodate needs among vulnerable groups during and after periods of crisis.

COVID-19 Stay-At-Home Orders and Older Adults' Cognitive Health - United States, June 2018-February 2022.

What is already known about this topic?: Lack of social activities is known to negatively impact cognitive functioning and increase risk of cognitive impairment, including dementia, among older adults. What is added by this report?: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) stay-at-home orders implemented in the U.S. early during the pandemic were not found to negatively affect cognitive functioning of older adults. What are the implications for public health practice?: There may have been no severe, unintended consequences of the COVID-19 stay-at-home orders in terms of their impact on cognitive functioning and risk of dementia among older adults, lending further support to use of such orders.

Experiences of healthcare providers during the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on them: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Frontline healthcare providers are redeployed to areas outside their clinical expertise and assigned high-loading workload to address the surge of patients with each coronavirus outbreak. Their importance in crisis is not in doubt. However, they experienced considerable physical distress and psychological stressors, even leading to psychological illness and infection in this environment. There is an urgent need to accurately, comprehensively and objectively understand their experiences, perceptions and current situation of burnout, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, insomnia and coronavirus infection. Therefore, this protocol is to conduct a mixed-methods systematic review to summarise the evidence on the experiences of healthcare providers and impacts of the coronavirus on their psychological status and infection during the pandemics. METHODS: Published studies on experience, perspective, impact, burnout, PTSD, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and infection of healthcare providers with SARS, Middle East respiratory syndrome and COVID-19, and written in English and Chinese will be accepted. Databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PubMed, Psychology Information, WanFang and SinoMed) from inception until 30 July 2020 will be searched. Two reviewers will select, screen, extract data and assess the risk of bias independently. Risk of bias of results will be using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Using a convergent integrated approach on qualitative/quantitative studies, we will synthesise qualitative and quantitative data separately. The incidence and number of cases about burnout, PTSD, anxiety, depression, insomnia and coronavirus infection among medical staff will be extracted. Then we will transform quantitative data to synthesise narrative findings. This protocol will be reported per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical assessment is not required due to the nature of the proposed systematic review. Findings of our research will be disseminated at conferences related to this field and through publication in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020198506.